25 Jan 2012

Alternate reasons you get rejected by a VC

Source: Zazzle T-shirts.
Source: Zazzle T-shirts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have to say "no" alot -- par for the course as a travel venture capitalist & investor. Typically 95% of the time which is about average with my peers. 

This means 95% of the entrepreneurs & businessmen/women I hear pitches from will hear "no" despite countless hours of sacrifice to get their venture to this point. I've been there and its never fun. 

Sometimes a “no” means “no” and an investor doesn’t feel your company, team, business model, market, roadmap or combination thereof is worth investing in. 

Here are some other reasons you may get a "no" from a VC:

• • Your company does not meet the financial metrics a VC firm follows. A VC firm will want a 10X or 20X return on their investment.

I see companies all the time that will make sustainable & profitable businesses that I have no doubt will inevitably spin off cash to their owners and investors; just not fast enough to warrant a VC investment.

Remember that 1 out of 10 VC investments is a 'hit' -- if you're good -- so that means the firm has 4 or 5 investments that go belly up and maybe 2 or 3 companies that return just what the firm put in. These are investments without personal guarantees or collateral so the 10X or 20X return looks greedy but should be taken in context for the risk. 

• The market you’re addressing isn’t large enough or growing fast enough for institutional funding (but may sustain a viable business using other sources of funding/lending).

• You are competing with other deals the VC firm is currently investing in. Your deal may be overshadowed by another deal but could have been funded if it came in earlier or was in another 'batch' of investments. 

 You are competing with the returns from earlier investments deals. Like a batter opting out of going to bat because they don’t want to ruin their batting average. 

• You may not get an outright “no”. I hated this when I was fundraising. VC's who waste your time or keep you strung along other entrepreneur investor horror stories; I feel your pain.

Now that I'm on the other side I only use the ‘until you get more traction’ response if I feel a prospective investment isn’t quite there yet but interesting enough to see if you get further than you are now. I know others are increasingly transparent as well so there is hope.

 

 

 

21 Mar 2011

Know your industry. Know your customers. Know yourself.

If you’re the founder of a seed staged company looking to get funded, know your industry, know your customers and know yourself. Let me start with industry.

I deal with first time founders to ones on their 5th company who speak at Davos and one common trait among the successful (or soon to be successful) is their respective level of expertise.

Genuinely come across as having been in the industry beyond your years.

The confidence these founders exude when I ask them pointed questions and the “wow, this guy really knows what he’s talking about” feeling I get back. It separates the funded founders from the rest of the noise filled grandiose pitches investors hear all day.

Tell an investor something he doesn’t already know. The more of an expert you talk to, the better you have to be. You may be able to pull a mediocre answer past a generalist but talk to a vertical VC (that’s a term I coined BTW) and you’ll get your behind handed to you.

Successful founders don’t know it all but they know their space very well. By virtue of (a) reading trade and trade blog posts, (b) taking the time to think through trends and their impact on the industry and their company, (c) to actively pattern match and eliminate incorrect assumptions, (d) to accurately convey facts and figure from reputable (and not always mainstream) sources, (e) to stay hyper vigilant on their competitors & potential competitors and most importantly the courage to (f) execute upon their conclusions. They attend conferences, they speak at conferences and leverage social media and blogs to embody thought leadership. They aren’t afraid to dig deep into SEC filings for research. They seek out contrarian points of view and engage in active listening. They aren’t afraid to admit they’re wrong yet aren’t afraid to argue a point without feeling defensive or making the other person feel the same way.

SUCCINCTLY COMMUNICATE YOUR KNOWLEDGE

Simply having the right information is not enough. If a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, bumbling through an explanation is arguably a close second.

You must be able to effectively communicate your point of view, with the least yet most effective number of words possible and be prepared to back your opinion up with supporting evidence.

Investors look at team and product or some combination thereof depending on the stage of company and in every scenario, they want to know you’ve done your homework on everything (the industry, competitors, trends, threats, who’s gotten funded and who hasn’t, analyst reports, social media buzz — the list goes on and on).

That you’ve thought things through. That you’ve played out ‘if then’ scenarios and not just regugitated what you’ve read on TechCrunch. From what features your product will have in 6 months or 9 months, to the headcount, to how you intend on attracting talent to what competitive advantages you seek to exploit. That you didn’t just put this startup on a whim based on a few Google searches and some “personal pain point” you wanted to fill.

  • What are the pro’s and con’s of addressing your current niche versus another?
  • Why does your product actually matter? How do you know that?
  • What companies could come into your space that would positively or negatively disrupt your business?
  • That you realize your weaknesses and have an answer for them. “We know we are overly reliant on ____ CRM package but that’s only the case for 6 months; after which we’ll have an API and can connect with SalesForce and SugarCRM”.
  • If you rely on 2 key suppliers, what happens if they merge. If you rely on PayPal as your merchant provider, what happens if they turn you off one day? What % of your revenue have you set aside of chargebacks? What is the industry chargeback average and how you expect to be lower than that?
  • What trends need to catch on for your business model to skyrocket or fall off a cliff? And what are you going to do about it? What threshold needs to be reached before you start to worry? Are you waiting for SaaS storage pricing to drop to 10 cents a GB versus 15 cents now.
  • What truly differentiates you and what evidence do you have that others will pay you based on these factors?
  • How are customers going to find you without you throwing money at acquiring them? And how you know they’ll be around after the 30 day trial is over?

Founders sometimes stop after identifying the low ball questions — if you run a CRM company, a SalesForce question is highly probable.

It’s intelligently answering the deeper dive questions that will truly separate you and tip the funding percentages in your favor.

 

21 Mar 2011

Is the dot com bubble back? Not if you look at total VC Investment, Deal Sizes or Follow On %’s

There’s a growing notion coming out of the Valley that the hey days of high valuations and free investment dollars of the dot com boom are back in full swing.To the extent you’re on the beneficial end of this phenom, more power to you.

Diving deeper into VC investment numbers paints a different picture.

TOTAL VC INVESTMENT DOLLARS (Source)

MoneyTree Total Venture Capital Investment Dollars for and Q1-Q3 2010 was $4.93B, $6.94B and $4.82B respectively.

The same for Q1-Q4 of 2000 was $27.43B,  $26.66B,  $25.21B and $20.76B respectively.

Year over year differences aren’t rounding errors — we have a ways to go before it’s even in the realm of an apples to apples comparison.

AVERAGE VC INVESTMENT DEAL SIZES (Source)

Average deal size in Q1-Q3 of 2010 is $6.53M, $7.22M and $6.18M respectively.

Average deal size in Q1-Q3 of 2000 is $12.71M, $12.56M and $12.99M respectively.

Similar disparity is found when looking at how many new investments versus follow-on investments are taking place.

I wish I could take credit for this tid bit of information — that goes to a trusted Partner at Perkins Coie; I simply researched the numbers.

Here’s to a follow on post a year from now that’s considerably more optimistic.

 

14 Sep 2010

7 Simple Suggestions for Any Online Travel Company

One look at industry wide customer satisfaction numbers for online travel speak for themselves; they’re abysmal.

OFFER RANDOM CASH BACK

Are you nuts? You want me to give money away !@#$!@#??  I know how low your margins are. Relax. Start with the customers booking for the 2nd or 3rd time. If you don’t have a system to track that, your punishment is randomly giving money away. Call customers and ask what their favorite charity is and give the rebate to them. Better yet, give $500 USD (or some %) every month to a different cause.

REMEMBER ME

Make me feel like I’m your only customer. I wrote a whole post on personalization that I think every OTA should start to implement. Make the traveler feel special and you’ll marvel at your higher revenue & conversion rates. Whether it’s “Dear Abrar” and not “Dear Traveler” on e-mails, to calling after my trip to see how things went, to more intricate customizations like answering the phone in my name (based on my Caller ID).

TAKE INCOMING SALES & SERVICE CALLS

Don’t listen to them, answer them. I learned more on those calls than I ever did on the weekly status reports I received. Use the exact same systems and processes your agents do. You’re no longer the CEO or Owner, you’re Joe Travel Agent answering the phone. How many times do you need ‘manager approval’? How many times did you need to ask for help? How many ‘clicks’ on your agency CRM and GDS system did it take you to complete a transaction?

BOOK THE WAY CUSTOMERS DO

Buy using the exact purchasing flow your customers do. Goes for online or offline purchases. I made the mistake of buying through ‘internal’ channels for my own trips. I would email or call one of our agents, put multiple reservations on hold, they’d call ticketing when I was ready and I was done a few minutes later. In case you’ve forgotten, the rapid pricing, rapid ticketing and personalized updates is exactly what your customers want too.

WATCH NON-TECHIE NON-TRAVEL PEOPLE

Look over their shoulders while buying online or listen while they’re on the phone. Avoid ‘helping’ and ‘explaining’ while this happens. Observe where they stumble, where they needed more information, where they didn’t understand something, if they understood your agents, if the agents actually solved the problem or not. Much to be learned.

CONTACT CUSTOMER SERVICE THE WAY CUSTOMERS DO 

You thought buying as a customer was eye opening? Try doing a ticket change/cancellation with those ‘rules’ you setup for agents. Even if you know changes are not allowed, call anyway. See what your agents say. Speak to a manager. If you work at a big enough company or an offshore call center, chances are they don’t know you’re the CEO of the company so don’t worry about changing your name, etc.

CALL CUSTOMERS AND TALK TO THEM

Here’s an idea, call your customers. Shoot the breeze. Get to know them. Tell them you’re the CEO and their booking has been ticketed and you wanted to say thank you. You’ll be AMAZED at their reactions. One, that management called (bigger the agency the more effective!). Two, that somebody called at all. Isn’t that sad?

I know you don’t have time to call everybody but you can call somebody. Now that the customer is in a good mood, ask them a few questions like “why did they book” and “who else did they consider” and “how much cheaper/higher your OTA was?”.

DOES THIS WORK? YES.

I know, I did it. It took me a few years to figure it out but I did.

3 Sep 2010

Customer Service as Ancillary Revenue

TICSS Customer Service Measurement Model
Image via Wikipedia

 

I'm suggesting a shift from thinking ofcustomer service as arevenue source -- which by definition makes it a form of Ancillary Revenue -- rather than asunk cost.

Don't you already feel a little bit better aboutcustomer service having framed it as a revenue source?? Let's start with an example.

When I call an online travel agency and they go out of their way to fix a problem, that creates goodwill, which has a value.

The revenue from my next 5 purchases directly related to your customer service efforts is additional revenue.

The cost of acquiring me as a customer is now amortized over multiple transactions and not just one purchase (the one with the problem which never got fixed which led me to never buy from you again).

The revenue generated from telling my friends generates additional revenue (at a low or no incremental cost). How many seconds does it take me to Tweet or worse yet FB post my experience (which you'll never get to see and therefore can't fix nor will it show up on any agency report).

Increase in market cap and differentiation. A little bit of customer service goes such a long way; travelers are yearning for the littlest morsel of help. Somebody at that massive online travel agency cares -- there's actually a human on the other side of this phone call.

Take the First Step.

Start with a clear intention of tracking the costs and revenue for a given set of customer(s). Intention is everything!

Start with one product and one set of customers and go from there. .

Use accurate 'averages' if you can't get specific numbers. Limit your pilot to high margin products if that makes it easier internally champion.

Work with your colleagues in marketing, sales and finance.

Track the values on an Excel file if need be.

Apply it to historical data if you have all the data sets.


Why Isn't This Done

First, Short Term Thinking. As executives and managers, we're knee deep in the here and now that we don't have time to think longer term.

Second, It's not easy. The gravity and scope of what I'm advocating hasn't escaped me. It's a nightmare even tracking the costs and assigning a value to them. You don't have to tell me, I've done this, I know.

Third, and I'm no accountant,  but my agency operations background tells me there is no universal report that shows the numbers side by side. Nothing that shows the actual costs for the customer service (say $5.00 in agent salary, $0.25 in phone call..) alongside the newly generated (or projected) revenue coming from the incremental revenue,  goodwill and lower customeramortization costs.

It'll be worth it in the end.

2 Sep 2010

Is FriendSourced Travel The Next Big Thing?

This UML diagram describes the domain of Faceb...
Image via Wikipedia

Imagine the ability to tap into everything your friends know about travel. Every destination they've been, every activity they've done, every hotel they've stayed in, every trip they've taken. If you could bottle that up and use it for your next trip, wouldn't that be valuable to you? That's the power of FriendSourced Travel.

What Is FriendSourced Travel?

FriendSourced Travel describes the process of tabulating input from your Facebook friends for the sole purpose of making a more informed and personalized travel decision. Facebook friend covers friends/family/acquaintances that are your 'friends' on Facebook.

FriendSourced travel falls under the banner of social travel.

Simple Example

If you were trying to decide where to go for your honeymoon, you'd FriendSource this to all your married FaceBook friends. You could suggest a few destinations and gauge their input or leave the destination list entirely up to them.

It's a conscious decision to include a cross section of your friends in the traveldecision making process and not just a few random phone calls or emails asking where you should go.

Why Would You FriendSource your Travel?

FriendSourcing your Travel captures conscious and subconscious nuggets of information we all collect from one another, through initial and ongoing interactions, for the purpose of making more informed travel decisions.

When I recommend a trip or a destination or activity to you, I automatically use what I know in the decision making process. That's the beauty of FriendSourced Travel.

Even in very loose interactions, people get to know you. By meeting you at a party, I'd get to know a little about you (first impressions, what do you do, interests, where you work, who else you know here, where you went to school, whether you're smart or not, how much I like you ...). Maybe we see each other at church or over dinner, we talk some more. Fast forward a few months and we become Facebook Friends. By this point, we know quite a bit about one another don't we? Maybe you find out I've been to Fiji and London and Hong Kong. I find out you've been to Italy and Morocco.

With FriendSourcing, we can tap into each others travel knowledge to make our next trip better.

FriendSourcing Travel Done Right

FriendSourcing Travel can't be done through wall posts and comments. There needs to be a Facebook application built around the components of FriendSourcing Travel.

That allows for suggestions on where to go/what to do/where to stay.

To allow for a healthy discourse (read arguments) so people can share their experiences and influence one another. Think a few one liners and not lengthy soliloquy's like this blog post.

Last but not least, to allow for people to rank the collective suggestions and vote on them like you would a Digg post.

There needs to be a mechanism to give more weight to some friends than others -- so friends who've been to that destination before (because their profile says so) get more weight in the decision making process. I can assign a 3.0X multiple to my friend John who lives on a plane. I could assign more weight to a destination my wife "votes" up. Even the ability to remove friends from the decision making process all together.

The application should allow me to segment my friends by geography, status, age, etc. I should be able to ask just my married friends about where to go for my honeymoon, or only my single friends on where I should go for my bachelor party. I should be able to ask my friends in New Yorkfor what Indian Restaurant I should go to next time I'm there.

The application needs to assign all my friends a 'score' based on where they've been. This can be derived literally from the  'Where I've Been' Facebook Application but not everybody has that installed so we'd have to look at interests, tags, destinations and more nuances sources like "Our Fiji Honeymoon Pictures" or "Fiji Videos".

I'm just scratching the surface on functionality.

Where Can I FriendSource my Travel?

There are a few companies that are starting to do this but none that warrant me listing them here. I'll post a list in October 2010. Sorry!

What to FriendSource

Any trip qualifies. Even business trips (imagine a LinkedIn FriendSourcded Travel application).

When to FriendSource your Travel

When you have enough of a "network" of friends, when you have some connection to your friends, when (on the whole) you trust your friends, when you're open to the idea of outside influence in your travel decision making process.

When NOT to FriendSource your Travel

This approach is based on the premise that your online friends (Facebook friends for example) have some connection to you. If you accept every Facebook Friend Request regardless of whether you know them or not, this doesn't apply to you. I would argue you're getting closer to CrowdSourcing your Travel there.

If you don't have a large enough pool of Friends, don't bother. If it's just you and 3 Facebook friends, this isn't going to work. You need at least 50 friends or more and ideally more. On the whole, certainly after 6 months to a year, you're going to have enough friends to qualify for FriendSourcing your Travel.

Rebuttals

Can't you just search travel review sites and do a little homework? Sure you can but FriendSourcing can extend that research even further. It's not an either or, you can do both. Even if you compare FriendSourcing to individual research, done right, FriendSourcing yields a better result.

What if I'm friends with someone who's travel opinion I don't want? The application should allow to 'ignore' a persons recommendation in the final tally.

Can I use this with Twitter or Ning or other networks? Possibly. Preferablysocial networks that mimic the social dynamics of Facebook.  Networks where anybody can friend or follow you do not apply.

Tell me what you think!

Share some comments and follow me on Twitter (@travelalchemist) for updates.

The first company that does this will offer a leap forward in social travel in a way we have yet to see.

28 Aug 2010

YCombinator Demo Day Observations

I had a chance to attend YCombinator’s (“YC”) Demo Day — where the latest batch of 36 YC startups present for 2 1/2 minutes to a broad spectrum of investors.

  • It was nice to see so many of the startups had secured 1 or more key clients. This is where the YC brand and the YC team can set crucial introductions.
  • If memory serves me right, only 1 of the companies had 1 founder. Everybody had 2 or more. When I ran my own online travel agency, I was the only CXO for a very long time and that was a mistake. We have a company we’re looking to invest in and a key roadblock is it’s a 1 man show and that’s concerning when we’re putting in $500k.
  • Is it a feature or a company? I took to the companies that solved a problem that made me want to signup and pay for them on the spot. AdGrokHireHivePagerDutyBrushes. Others had nice offerings and solved simple pain points but not deep enough pain points for me to actually pay for the service even after discounting the fact that they’re early stage companies. I won’t pick on them them here but I wish them well.
  • Notable absent any B2B or B2C Facebook related companies. I would have thought at least 1 or 2 of the 36 would have something on the FB platform. It’s hardly one you can ignore and certainly not without it’s risk.
  • It was nice to see women founders. This wouldn’t have come to mind had I not thought about it after reading blog comments on a TechCrunch post asking “how many of the YC companies had women co-founders?” — there were a few.
  • Interesting how many of the founders had Harvard, Columbia,  MIT, Stanford degrees. Equally notable that a few had ‘dropped out’  to pursue their dreams. ‘Dropping out’ just means ‘taking a year of’ and resuming if the startup fails but at least they did it. It’s not easy to quite the PhD program at MIT to pursue a startup.
  • Notable how many startups had experience at larger & more established companies. Being part of the industry you are now trying to disrupt is something we look for when investing.
  • “If you remember one thing about my company, it’s _______” was a stable part of the presentation.
  • The founders did a good job of working the room after the presentations were over. Kudos to getting out there and striking up a conversation with investors — who aren’t the easiest bunch to deal with since guess what, we get pitched all the time and have our guards up.
  • It was quite a varied bunch of investors. Individual investors, angel groups, university related angel groups, early stage funds, super angels, VC’s, celebrity investors and media/press. Made for an interesting cast of characters in the room.
  • Notable how many of the startups were profitable. They offered a product or service somebody paid for; usually a few hundred people (sometimes a few thousand) paid for. Which in turn raised their valuation and likelihood of getting funded. Gone are the day of slaving away for months and months without a profit.
  • It was a good mix of B2C, B2B and mobile applications. No one sector dominated which kept the presentations interesting.
  • I attended the 3rd and final batch of presentations and undoubtedly the companies used the first two batches to polish themselves up.

Applications this time include: disposable social networks, site metrics, restaurant tablets, travel search, mobile TV apps, child tracking, email context, mobile app promotion, job interview software, tablet games, file syncing, non-virtual goods, social motivation, apartment search, SEO tools, grocery price search, sports chat, tablet paint software, project management, service provider hubs, memorial sites, eyetracking, glanceable displays, SEM software, Twitter follower management, tablet productivity software, enterprise Q&A, outsourced sysadmin, a new inbox, a financial dashboard for businesses, geolocal chat, server notifications, and debt management.

24 Aug 2010

TravelWeekly.com 2010 Consumer Highlights

Highlights from the  Travel Weekly 2010 Consumer Survey (click link for complete survey)

18-31 year olds like using Travel Agents

Who knew! The 18 to 31 year olds represent 14% of the population yet represent a significantly higher percentage of theleisure travelers who use traditional agents. This is attributed to, among a variety of reasons, to that generation wanting to be coddled and online information overload.

Information overload

Frugality is the new norm.

Travelers are 36% more likely to use coupons, 35% more likely to wait for sales, 26% more likely to buy online.

The Only Green People Want To See Are Lower Fares

Of the total surveyed, 84% said no or are unsure about paying a higher fare to use a travel supplier that demonstrates environment responsibility.

Lists 4 different "tribes" of leisure travelers.

Sensationals make up 28% of all leisure travelers and are the youngest of the four segments (mean age of 40). They tend to be professional singles and couples with a preference for action/the club life. They also favor adventure and outdoor vacations, clothing-optional/spa destinations and travel primarily to play. They are particularly receptive to travel deals discovered through flash emails.

• Families represent 23% of all leisure travelers. They are family-vacation-oriented, represent the second-youngest segment by age (mean of 42), reside in dual-income households with children under 18 and are package-travel-oriented. Their preferences include theme parks, predictable experiences, cruises and beach vacations. They are safety-conscious and are smart comparison shoppers.

• Touristers represent 23% of all leisure travelers. They are happily married and the second-oldest group (mean of 47), entrepreneurial/driven to succeed and favor "no-mistake" travel. They view travel as an opportunity to learn. They take the most trips and spend the highest amount per trip. Their travel preferences index highly on family visits and high-end global destinations.

• Extraordinaires make up 26% of all travelers and are the oldest tribe (mean of 52).

More than one-third (36%) are grandparents. They tend to be wealthy empty-nesters seeking urban cultural experiences with a particular interest in museums and the theater. City, European and other foreign destinations index highly in terms of their preferences. They have a penchant for boutique hotels and resorts.

21 Aug 2010

Travel Startup Founders from Outside the Industry

Baggage claim area in Terminal 1 of McCarran I...
Image via Wikipedia

 

As an investor in travel companies -- from private beta travel startups to larger VC & travel growth equity deals -- I am fortunate to talk to travel companies of all sizes from all corners of the world.

One common theme are travel startup co-founders who do not come from the travel industry who reach an invisible ceiling when dealing with travel suppliers, reservation systems and members of the trade.

Foremost, If you find yourself in this situation, don't feel bad. You're not alone. That's just the way it is. It won't change anytime soon.  Heck, I wouldn't have a job if it was that easy! Took me 12 years in travel (on the agency and travel technology side) to get a feeling for how things truly work and even now I learn new things by virtue of the seasoned executives I work with.

Secondly, there is nothing wrong with this situation. It's what you do about it that I have an issue with.

How to Fix The Problem

  • Going It Alone: The Worst Thing To Do. There are outliers who do it alone but they are so few and far between that they're not worth mentioning. The majority (in my experience circa 95% of) shouldn't. The ones I've seen -- and I can't name them or I would -- are because they are so different that traditional travel suppliers are willing to give it a shot  and these companies almost always have a very strong 'IN'. While the founders may not be from the industry, they engaged somebody with some industry gray hair on their behalf. Rarely is it a 'cold call' into a supplier. Somebody new to the travel game going at it alone doesn't have a chance past some fluke wins and never enough to have a sustainable business model. Ask for help, it's natural
  • Get Good Advisors from the Travel Industry. Former travel executives, former travel company operators, somebody who has already done what you're trying to do; who can advise you with your strategy and business development.  Somebody hands on through till the deal is completed. Not just an introduction and you're on your own.  I'm biased but ask any travel startup whether I'm right. It would be one thing if "Going At It Alone" was only 2 or 3 times harder but my experience show it's considerably longer. 7 to 10 times harder. That's a lot of time and money to spend hitting your head against the wall -- assuming you have the time and money to spare -- which no travel startup ever does. All the while other travel startups are popping up every week.
  • Mashup with other travel startups/Web 2.0 Company API's. Don't have your own reservation system to pull flights from, what about using the Kayak API. What about a travel affiliate program in lieu of your own relationships. You won't make alot of $ but you'll have something to show your clients. Unfortunately this strategy won't work because you're selling what's already out there. If you're selling the same fares as everybody else, do you expect alot of transactions? You're just keeping up appearances to avoid gaping holes on your site.  You'll almost always need deep integration deployments which most affiliates programs don't offer. It's a viable interim solution. Travel startups use API mashups because they're  (a) not concentrating on revenue or (b) as a stop gap measure until professional industrial grade travel technology (booking engines, GDS links, etc..) are available. You'll need a proper travel technology platform if you intend on building a sustainable business.
  • Use Free or Open Source Data. You can get valuable content from Wikipedia.org to WikiTravel to a variety of places for free or for a low cost. Many travel startups already do if you take a deeper look. They have a core set of unique features complemented by 3rd party API's (Google, Kayak, IAN, etc..). Panaramio is a good example. There are some good services out there I would use as an interim solution.
  • Do a Round to Hire A Travel Executive. This is a tough proposition. Most investors 'don't get' travel investments. Be prepared for a lot of hand holding, a lot of 'educating', a reduced valuation and little in terms of productive post-investment relationships. While an investor "who knows somebody at Expedia" is better than nothing, knowing the contact is 1 thing -- actually talking the talk in a way a travel supplier will understand is something only a travel industry executive can do best. Is that investor going to be with you every step of the way for the next 4-6 months it takes to close a deal? It can be done  -- don't get me wrong -- but when you're at a travel startup you don't have the time to 'experiment' and no investor is going to put up with 'trial by error' on their dime.  Many a founder has realized money isn't enough. You need domain expertise. At an angel investment level I think "non-travel" investors should be avoided unless they're fine with putting in the money and hiring "travel experts" to formally guide the company. Being a "travel investor", I am biased, but ask any travel startup founder and I suspect they'll agree with me. If you have to get angel money, augment that with some travel executives and ensure everybody knows their place. The angel investors are the funds and the executives bring the travel industry knowledge.
  • Know What You're Good At and What You Not. Or find somebody you trust to guide you. I had a meeting a few weeks ago with somebody in the tourism business who wanted to advise our experts on SEO and Online Marketing Initiatives yet prior to the meeting simply outsourced his website to somebody else and wasn't using the Internet to sell his inventory now. It was purely a content site. My response was, what competency do you have with SEO/Online Marketing? This wasn't a "I like to listen in so I can learn" call -- which I encourage -- this was a "I have some serious notions in mind" call yet I've never done this before all while I want to work with a team that's done this for the past 5+ years with people who've done online travel marketing for the past 10 years. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and heard a few suggestions only to end the engagement 3 hours later. Its critically important to set the boundaries (ie: the vision is spearheaded by the founders, the travel related decisions are joint but favor the travel executive..) between what the (non travel) founders know and do and what the travel executives will do.
  • One Supplier Is Never Enough. Just because you have 1 vendors inventory -- say a hotel vendor -- doesn't

     

    Image representing Expedia as depicted in Crun...
    Image via CrunchBase

     

    mean you have all the inventory to sell. Said another way, getting Hotels.com or CCRA isn't the end all of all. They are both fine companies but the more inventory you can get, the better. They may be enough for certain use cases but without knowing the strengths/weaknesses of all the discount discount hotel inventory, how do you know you're okay? Particularly if you have a broad client base. If you have a niche -- say Las Vegas Hotels -- and you do a deal with the largest Las Vegas Discount Hotel Provider -- you're golden. Most travel startups don't follow such a narrow niche.

  • Inventory is critical to any travel startup. You don't need 1 set of inventory, you need them ALL. Do you even know how many pools of discount inventory are out there -- multiply that for every travel product you sell. Let alone getting 'approved' at the highest purchasing levels to actually compete with established players. The introductory "you're a small agency" commissions and price breaks isn't going to cut it. You need the volume purchasing discounts and its unlikely you'll get that without millions of dollars of existing volume and a track record even if you negotiate well and are funded. Once you get your account setup -- assuming it happens at all and it always takes more time than you could ever imagine -- you still have to get the inventory from their system into yours. A Javascript embed isn't going to cut it. Do you have a team of developers that have nothing else to do? And you need to repeat this for every vendor you plan on adding. If there are 12 pools of discount hotel inventory, that's 12 integrations, 12 relationships, months for each relationship and that's assuming you actually get approved. Oh by the way, all of the API's change all the time so you'll need to keep up. Did I mention there are discrepancies between what a reservation system says it does and what it can actually do via the API. There are times -- shockingly -- where the marketing team suggests features the technical team hasn't implemented yet. As a new client -- will you be in on the beta group to figure this out early? I can list dozens of situations any one of whom would bog a travel startup down.
  • Travel Developers, Not Just Any Software Developer. Depending on the use case, you may have no choice but in hiring software developers versed in travel technology. Simply hiring very good programmers isn't enough. There is a steep learning curve when it comes to travel supplier integrations and the nuances of travel trade that cannot be taught on the fly. Who's going to teach them at a travel startup without travel founders? I've seen this happen time and again. The project does get done but multiples longer and costlier than intended. Which to a founder translates to stress and investors screaming at you for missing deadlines. There's enough that can go wrong with any software development package -- which are sometimes rushed, poorly planned and underfunded -- coupled with offshore development headaches that by the time you throw in the travel trade learning curve, the founder is really dealing with a low to single digit success rate for an on time deployment.

You can see why travel startups have a low hit rate when it comes to penetrating the industry. They're fishes out of water. Rest assured there is help out there.

Give Me Your Feedback

Do you work at a travel startup? What are your experiences? Have some 'horror stories' to share? If you find this post valuable, please comment and Retweet!

21 Aug 2010

What the Google Travel Platform Could Look Like

I see Google coming out with its own travel platform based on my  'connecting the dots' between Google's existing product line and previous travel acquisitions. It certainly has all the pieces to. Only the powers that be within Google truly know -- I'm just thinking out loud here.

I see the ITA Platform being the parent travel architecture --- the Mother Ship -- which it’ll use to plug existing and future travel products/services into. Throw a few acquisitions in there to balance out the platform offering.

  • Airfare Pricing -- The billions of combinations of fares, schedules and availability available through the ITA QPX product.
  • Mobile Booking Engine or Mobile Travel Platform through the OnTheFly product ITA currently has.
  • Travel Content -- through Ruba (there are better content companies to buy but that’s for another blog post!). Coupled with YouTube travel videos.
  • Visual Travel -- add ITA Software to Google Earth and the notion of visual travel that many travel startups are attempting. Where a traveler can “see” their destination in 3D as part of researching a trip. How nice would that be – if their Visual Travel Offering is really good, maybe I won’t need to go on vacation at all. Just zooming in and “walking around” will be good enough.
  • Visual Travel Lite -- add ITA Software to Google Maps for what I’ll describe as visual travel lite. Ability to pick multiple points on a Google Map and automatically get pricing. Where it’s a 2D experience akin to what Kayak Explore does (which I love by the way – we need that but with the right inventory so I don’t have to search another site but Kayak!).
  • Google Checkout Travel Merchant Services -- Google Checkout, with changes in feature and policy, could easily offer a Travel Merchant Account Product. Anybody that sells travel knows how much of a problem taking credit cards is.
  • Google Social Travel play through the integration of ITA Software/Engine and the launch of (potential) Googles Kayak Killer coupled with its upcoming Facebook Killer. I agree that’s a lot of ‘theory’ but the stage is being set – whether they do it or not is a different story. A true social travel play could be in the making and I’ve had the pleasure of speaking with a number of social travel startups doing some very exciting things in this space. Google if you want to acquire any of them, please be in touch.
  • Predictive Travel. Take Google Insights for Search (for travel keywords for example) coupled with the QPX pricing engine coupled with the “predictive” algorithms in Google Trends and you could have a pretty interesting “travel suggestion engine” play going. End goal? For Google to tell me where I should go on vacation without having to think about it. 1 less thing I need to do.
  • The Door to Door Travel Company Play – take a number of “lesser” services like Google City Tours, Google Transit and add it to the ITA Software (and others on the page) along the lines of what Zoombu and other “door to door journey” sites want to do. Particularly as a differentiator within the (potential) Google Kayak Killer.
  • YouTube Travel Videos and User Generated Travel Content.
  • Customer Service -- Post purchase assistance with ticket changes and refunds and by addressing other “post purchase’ pain points based on the ITA Software ReShop product. Then integrating these services via an API.

Agree? Disagree?

Please RETWEET!

Abrar's Space

My passion is growing travel companies.

My expertise is rooted in 5 years of management consulting experience, 2 years leading software teams at a leading travel technology company and 9 years at an online travel agency.

Follow me on Twitter or drop me an email.